AI Visibility
measured21/100
Emerging · in Live Chat
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
9
across 292 prompts
AI Share of Voice
9%
across 292 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Live Chat
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories respond.io is visible in
2Executive summary
respond.io is strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has a large G2 footprint (494 reviews) and public, tiered pricing ($79/$159/$279) that AI can read. The biggest risk for “conversion + evaluation” prompts is missing/unclear first-party structured evaluation surfaces (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage schema and robust, brand-led vs-competitor pages), which can reduce how often AI cites respond.io for direct comparison and pricing questions.
Based on audit of respond.io · Jun 9, 2026