[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/respond.io
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

1

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

7

across 286 prompts

AI Share of Voice

7%

across 286 prompts

Category Visibility

#74

in Live Chat · of 120

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
162 category
Cited4%7/162
Share of voice3%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors5.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories respond.io is visible in

2
  • Live Chat73 of 120→
  • Customer Successnot yet measured→

Executive summary

respond.io is strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has a large G2 footprint (494 reviews) and public, tiered pricing ($79/$159/$279) that AI can read. The biggest risk for “conversion + evaluation” prompts is missing/unclear first-party structured evaluation surfaces (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage schema and robust, brand-led vs-competitor pages), which can reduce how often AI cites respond.io for direct comparison and pricing questions.

Based on audit of respond.io · Jun 9, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy