[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Qualaroo
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

7

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

22

across 351 prompts

AI Share of Voice

22%

across 351 prompts

Category Visibility

#24

in Survey Tools · of 62

Critical Issues

2

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
211 category
Cited22%46/211
Share of voice19%avg
Engine consensus44%of engines
Competitors11.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Qualaroo is visible in

2
  • Survey Tools24 of 62→
  • Feedback Managementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Qualaroo is a B2B SaaS (customer/user feedback & in-app/website surveys) and already has meaningful AI-citation inputs from G2 (48 reviews, 4.3/5) and Capterra (20 reviews, 4.7). The biggest AI citation risk is evaluation-stage “brand vs competitor” and “pricing” queries when first-party comparison/structured evaluation content and crawlable pricing/schema are missing or not reliably machine-readable; the single highest-ROI fix is to ensure robust first-party evaluation pages (brand-led comparisons) plus SoftwareApplication/FAQPage schema and crawlable pricing content.

Based on audit of qualaroo.com · May 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy