AI Visibility
measured26/100
Emerging · in Workflow Automation
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
11
across 344 prompts
AI Share of Voice
11%
across 344 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Workflow Automation
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
ProcessMaker is a B2B workflow/process automation platform with strong third-party review visibility (e.g., 305 G2 reviews) and active citation sources like TrustRadius and Reddit. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage “brand vs competitor” and “pricing” queries: the homepage redirects to Decisions.com, and pricing appears sales-gated/uncrawlable for AI engines, limiting first-party conversion answers.
Based on audit of processmaker.com · Aug 30, 2026