AI Visibility
measured44/100
Frequently Cited · in Voice AI
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals52/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 546 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 546 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/80
Not Visible · Ai Automation Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Voice AI
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Play.ht is visible in
2Your visibility gap
Play.ht surfaces in 0/80 Ai Automation discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
play.ht has meaningful B2B citation signals via G2 (89 reviews) and secondary review presence on Capterra, plus strong agentic crawl support through docs.play.ht/llms.txt. The biggest reason it’s not showing up for your highest-value Ai Automation shortlist queries (e.g., healthcare providers, marketing teams, data analysis/reporting) is missing first-party evaluation content that maps play.ht to those operational workflows (and likely missing SoftwareApplication/FAQPage-style structured pages on the main domain).
Based on audit of play.ht · Aug 29, 2026