AI Visibility
measured72/100
Frequently Cited · in Identity & Access Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals68/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
78
across 472 prompts
AI Share of Voice
78%
across 456 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Identity & Access Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Ping Identity is visible in
3Executive summary
Ping Identity is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage IAM/IAM-adjacent queries because it has strong third-party review authority (e.g., 106 G2 reviews with a 4.4/5 rating) and clear analyst/enterprise signals (Gartner Peer Insights profile exists). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen first-party evaluation surfaces for AI (especially SoftwareApplication/FAQPage coverage and crawlable comparison/pricing evaluation blocks) so brand-aware queries like “Ping Identity vs Okta” and “Ping Identity pricing” can be answered from pingidentity.com rather than only from third parties.
Based on audit of pingidentity.com · May 5, 2026