AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Vertical SaaS
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals47/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 322 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 322 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Vertical SaaS
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
PatientNow has strong B2B citation anchors via G2 (58 reviews shown on its G2 seller page) and active first-party comparison content (e.g., “best patient intake software” and multiple “alternatives” posts). The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage conversion queries: pricing is publicly crawlable but appears to be quote/demo-led (no transparent tier pricing), and there’s no evidence of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data or llms.txt/robots.txt AI-bot allow signals.
Based on audit of patientnow.com · Sep 1, 2026