AI Visibility
measured34/100
Emerging · in Document Generation
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals3/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
52
across 797 prompts
AI Share of Voice
52%
across 797 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Document Generation
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Paperwork is visible in
3Executive summary
paperwork.rocks appears to be a blog-style site about document/note-taking/archiving software rather than a B2B SaaS product with a clear offering and buyer workflow. The biggest AI-citation risk is that the site lacks first-party evaluation assets (pricing, structured Q&A, and product-specific structured data), so AI engines will struggle to cite it for “best/alternatives/pricing” queries beyond generic list-style content.
Based on audit of paperwork.rocks · Oct 3, 2026