AI Visibility
measured43/100
Frequently Cited · in Education & LMS
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals56/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
13
across 298 prompts
AI Share of Voice
13%
across 298 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Education & LMS
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Padlet is visible in
2Executive summary
Padlet is strongly cited for evaluation-stage queries via high-volume G2 reviews (338 reviews, 4.9/5) and secondary signals like Capterra (320 reviews, 4.9). The biggest AI citation risk is conversion-stage evaluation queries that require first-party, crawlable comparison/evaluation content (e.g., “[Padlet] vs [competitor]” and “Padlet pricing” in AI Overviews) and structured-data eligibility (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage), which appear thin or not discoverable from search.
Based on audit of padlet.com · Oct 2, 2026