AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Design
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals45/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
2
across 651 prompts
AI Share of Voice
2%
across 651 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Design
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Pacdora is visible in
3Executive summary
Pacdora is likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has a G2 profile with 36 reviews, but it is at risk for “best/alternatives” shortlist queries where AI expects stronger third-party review depth and first-party evaluation content. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party, brand-led evaluation pages (e.g., “Pacdora vs X” and “alternatives to Pacdora”) with crawlable SSR content and evaluation-focused FAQ blocks.
Based on audit of pacdora.com · Aug 30, 2026