AI Visibility
measured11/100
Emerging · in Scheduling & Calendar
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals4/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
9
across 313 prompts
AI Share of Voice
9%
across 313 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Scheduling & Calendar
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Coastapp.com is a B2B CMMS/EAM-style maintenance management SaaS and already has strong third-party review visibility (notably Capterra 4.7/98 reviews and G2 review surfaces). The biggest AI citation risk is evaluation-stage “brand vs competitor” and “pricing” queries when AI can’t reliably extract structured product/pricing signals (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/structured pricing) from crawlable pages—so the highest-ROI fix is adding/validating B2B evaluation structured data + ensuring pricing tiers are fully crawlable/SSR for AI crawlers.
Based on audit of coastapp.com · May 8, 2026