[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Omnisend
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

71

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

62

across 470 prompts

AI Share of Voice

63%

across 446 prompts

Category Visibility

#11

in Email Marketing · of 91

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
381 category
Cited64%245/381
Share of voice56%avg
Engine consensus46%of engines
Competitors5.6avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
13 brand-level
Cited92%12/13
Share of voice92%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited67%4/6
Share of voice67%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
9 brand-level
Cited100%9/9
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Omnisend is visible in

2
  • Email Marketing11 of 91→
  • Marketing Automation27 of 158→

Executive summary

Omnisend is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for “best marketing automation software” and ecommerce-focused evaluation queries because it has strong G2 authority (1171 reviews, 4.6★) and first-party head-to-head content like “Omnisend vs. Klaviyo” and “Omnisend vs. ActiveCampaign.” The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured data + crawlability for evaluation surfaces (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage + pricing visibility) so AI engines can reliably extract “How much does Omnisend cost?” and “How does Omnisend compare to Brevo Marketing Platform/ActiveCampaign/Klaviyo/Mailchimp?” from Omnisend pages rather than falling back to third parties.

Based on audit of omnisend.com · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy