AI Visibility
measured34/100
Emerging · in Real Estate & Property Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 534 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 534 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Real Estate & Property Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Occupier is a B2B lease management + lease accounting SaaS that already has strong AI-citation inputs from G2 (184 reviews) and Capterra (19 reviews, 4.6 rating). The biggest risk to appearing in evaluation-stage AI answers is conversion-stage crawlability: pricing is “Request Pricing” (no public tier prices), so AI engines can’t reliably cite cost details—fix this by publishing crawlable, tiered pricing (or at least price ranges) on an SSR page.
Based on audit of occupier.com · Sep 30, 2026