AI Visibility
measured40/100
Frequently Cited · in Office & Productivity
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals68/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
15
across 338 prompts
AI Share of Voice
15%
across 338 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Office & Productivity
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Nectar is visible in
2Executive summary
Nectar HR is already highly citable for evaluation-stage queries because it has very large third-party review footprints (e.g., 8,000+ G2 reviews and strong Capterra presence). The biggest remaining AI-citation risk is conversion-stage “pricing” and structured evaluation queries: the first-party pricing experience appears to route to a demo/get-pricing flow rather than showing clear public tiers, and there’s no evidence (from search) of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data that would help AI engines answer “what is it / pricing / integrations” directly from nectarhr.com.
Based on audit of nectarhr.com · Sep 1, 2026