AI Visibility
measured27/100
Emerging · in Workflow Automation
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals71/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 355 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 336 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Workflow Automation
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
n8n.io is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage prompts like "What is the best iPaaS software?" and "What is the best iPaaS software for workflow automation and app integrations?" because it has strong G2 authority (225 reviews, 4.8★) and first-party comparison pages for "How does n8n compare to Zapier?" and "How does n8n compare to Make?". The single highest-ROI fix is to add/verify B2B-structured evaluation schema (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage) and ensure it’s present on key pages (pricing + vs pages), so AI engines can reliably cite pricing and comparison answers without falling back to third parties.
Based on audit of n8n.io · Apr 2, 2026