AI Visibility
measured26/100
Emerging · in Note-Taking
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
5
across 291 prompts
AI Share of Voice
5%
across 291 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Note-Taking
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories MindNode is visible in
2Executive summary
MindNode is likely cited by AI engines mainly through third-party review/roundup sources (notably G2 and TrustRadius) and community discussions, but it is weaker for AI “evaluation” queries that require crawlable, structured first-party pages (pricing, comparisons, and schema). The single highest-ROI fix is to ensure first-party pages for pricing and evaluation-style Q&A are fully crawlable/SSR and include strong structured data (FAQPage + Organization/Product where applicable) so AI can answer “alternatives/pricing/how it works” directly from mindnode.com.
Based on audit of mindnode.com · Oct 7, 2026