[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Mailerlite
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

66

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

31

across 412 prompts

AI Share of Voice

33%

across 389 prompts

Category Visibility

#14

in Email Marketing · of 91

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
262 category
Cited42%109/262
Share of voice33%avg
Engine consensus44%of engines
Competitors7.6avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
14 brand-level
Cited0%0/14
Share of voice0%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors—
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited17%1/6
Share of voice17%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited20%1/5
Share of voice20%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Mailerlite is visible in

2
  • Email Marketing14 of 91→
  • Marketing Automation46 of 158→

Executive summary

MailerLite is very likely to be cited by AI engines for email marketing evaluation queries because it has strong third-party review presence (G2 and TrustRadius) and first-party comparison content (e.g., MailerLite vs Mailchimp pages). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen Structured Data/Technical AEO for evaluation-stage prompts (SoftwareApplication + pricing/FAQ schema), because current live checks did not surface SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating markup on the domain.

Based on audit of mailerlite.com · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy