AI Visibility
measured32/100
Emerging · in Browser Automation
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals49/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
13
across 358 prompts
AI Share of Voice
13%
across 358 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/80
Not Visible · Robotic Process Automation Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Browser Automation
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Magical is visible in
2Your visibility gap
Magical surfaces in 0/80 Robotic Process Automation discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Magical has strong AI-citation foundations for evaluation queries via its G2 presence (76 reviews, 4.7★) and first-party comparison content (e.g., “Magical vs. Zapier”). The biggest blocker for high-intent RPA buyer prompts is missing/weak crawlable “RPA how it works + implementation” coverage (your shortlist tier is 0/80 for Robotic Process Automation discovery prompts), plus likely gaps in B2B structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and crawlability signals for pricing/technical pages.
Based on audit of getmagical.com · Jun 9, 2026