[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Magical
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

0

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

13

across 357 prompts

AI Share of Voice

13%

across 357 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Shortlist Position

0/80

Not Visible · Robotic Process Automation Discovery

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
227 category
Cited14%31/227
Share of voice14%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice92%avg
Engine consensus92%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Magical is visible in

2
  • Robotic Process Automationnot yet measured→
  • Workflow Automationnot yet measured→

Your visibility gap

Magical surfaces in 0/80 Robotic Process Automation discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.

Claim Magical →

Executive summary

Magical has strong AI-citation foundations for evaluation queries via its G2 presence (76 reviews, 4.7★) and first-party comparison content (e.g., “Magical vs. Zapier”). The biggest blocker for high-intent RPA buyer prompts is missing/weak crawlable “RPA how it works + implementation” coverage (your shortlist tier is 0/80 for Robotic Process Automation discovery prompts), plus likely gaps in B2B structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and crawlability signals for pricing/technical pages.

Based on audit of getmagical.com · Jun 9, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy