AI Visibility
measured43/100
Frequently Cited · in Applicant Tracking
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals4/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 393 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 393 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Applicant Tracking
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Loxo is visible in
3Executive summary
loxo.co is a B2B recruiting/talent intelligence SaaS and already has strong AI-citation inputs from G2 and secondary review ecosystems (e.g., Capterra 127 reviews, TrustRadius exists with 12 reviews). The biggest AI citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison coverage: while loxo.co hosts first-party competitor pages (e.g., “Loxo vs. Crelate”, “Loxo vs. Recruit CRM”), there’s no evidence in live signals of a dedicated, crawlable “Loxo vs [top competitor]” evaluation hub that AI engines can reliably extract for shortlist answers. Highest-ROI fix: expand/standardize first-party comparison pages into a consistent, indexable evaluation format (tables + clear “why Loxo” lead section) and ensure structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) is present across product + comparison + pricing pages.
Based on audit of loxo.co · May 7, 2026