[unCited]
Loom

Loom

Content

Async video messaging that replaces meetings and long email threads

63/100
Emerging#12 of 22 in Content

Executive summary

Loom is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (G2: 2342 reviews, 4.7★, Leader) and it publishes first-party comparison content (e.g., Loom vs Vidyard) plus a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit tiers. The biggest remaining citation risk is structured-data/technical AEO gaps (no detectable SoftwareApplication/FAQPage schema in live crawl signals) and incomplete coverage for some competitor-specific comparison prompts (notably ScreenPal, Zight, and Camtasia in the exact “Loom compare to X” format).

Based on audit of loom.com · Apr 1, 2026

Avg Prompt Score

57

across 20 prompts

Category Rank

#12

of 22 brands

vs. Category Avg

0

avg 63/100

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Content · score distribution

22 brands
18avg 6378

63/100 · #12 of 22 · at category avg · median 66

Pillar scores vs. category average

Citation Readiness
66-9
Content Quality
70-3
Platform Optimization
58-9
Structured Data
45-12
Technical AEO
62-14

Vertical line = category average (22 brands)