[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Loom
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

58

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

49

across 1106 prompts

AI Share of Voice

49%

across 1106 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
809 category
Cited64%521/809
Share of voice57%avg
Engine consensus43%of engines
Competitors6.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
19 brand-level
Cited100%19/19
Share of voice86%avg
Engine consensus86%of engines
Competitors1.4avg/cited
Sentimentpositive16+ / 8~ / 0−
🛡️Trust
7 brand-level
Cited100%7/7
Share of voice86%avg
Engine consensus86%of engines
Competitors2.1avg/cited
Sentimentpositive1+ / 2~ / 0−
💰Conversion
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice84%avg
Engine consensus83%of engines
Competitors2.0avg/cited
Sentimentneutral0+ / 3~ / 0−

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Loom is visible in

3
  • Collaboration20 of 156→
  • Team Messagingnot yet measured→
  • Video Editingnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Loom is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (e.g., G2 shows 2,388 reviews with a 4.7/5 rating). The single highest-ROI fix is to improve Technical AEO crawlability: robots.txt currently blocks GPTBot (and likely other AI crawlers), which can prevent AI engines from extracting Loom’s own evaluation/conversion content (especially pricing and comparison pages).

Based on audit of loom.com · May 20, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy