AI Visibility
measured34/100
Emerging · in Video Editing
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
48
across 1101 prompts
AI Share of Voice
49%
across 1101 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Video Editing
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Loom is visible in
3Executive summary
Loom is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (e.g., G2 shows 2,388 reviews with a 4.7/5 rating). The single highest-ROI fix is to improve Technical AEO crawlability: robots.txt currently blocks GPTBot (and likely other AI crawlers), which can prevent AI engines from extracting Loom’s own evaluation/conversion content (especially pricing and comparison pages).
Based on audit of loom.com · May 20, 2026