AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Task Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals56/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 389 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 389 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Task Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
ListedKit is already meaningfully cited for evaluation-stage queries via its G2 presence (24 reviews, 4.8/5) and has publicly crawlable pricing ($14.99/credit with bulk tiers). The biggest AI-citation risk is missing/unclear enterprise analyst + secondary review coverage (no confirmed TrustRadius/Gartner Peer Insights profile found) and likely incomplete structured data for SoftwareApplication/ratings, which limits Google AI Overviews and other LLM rich-result citations.
Based on audit of listedkit.com · Sep 29, 2026