[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Linear
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook

Other products from Linear

Linear62
Claim profile →

AEO Score

62

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

24

across 470 prompts

AI Share of Voice

25%

across 470 prompts

Category Visibility

#12

in Project Management Software · of 131

Critical Issues

2

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
451 brand-level
Cited44%200/451
Share of voice22%avg
Engine consensus49%of engines
Competitors38.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
11 brand-level
Cited91%10/11
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.6avg/cited
Sentimentpositive20+ / 7~ / 0−
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.5avg/cited
Sentimentpositive5+ / 4~ / 0−
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice92%avg
Engine consensus92%of engines
Competitors2.8avg/cited
Sentimentneutral0+ / 5~ / 0−

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Linear is visible in

4
  • Developer Tools6 of 224→
  • Project Management Software12 of 131→
  • Task Management13 of 86→
  • Collaboration23 of 156→

Executive summary

Linear.app is strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation/trust prompts because it has active B2B review presence (e.g., G2 and TrustRadius) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit tiers. The biggest risk for conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “shortlist” queries is missing/unclear first-party comparison content and lack of verified structured-data signals (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) that AI engines can reliably extract.

Based on audit of linear.app · May 25, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy