Other products from Linear
AI Visibility
measured60/100
Frequently Cited · in Project Management Software
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals66/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
24
across 470 prompts
AI Share of Voice
23%
across 454 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Project Management Software
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Linear is visible in
4Executive summary
Linear.app is a strong B2B citation candidate for evaluation-stage queries because it has a public, crawlable pricing page with explicit tiers ($0/$10/$16) and meaningful third-party review presence (e.g., G2 shows 92 reviews). The highest-ROI fix is to add/strengthen first-party evaluation content for comparison-style queries (e.g., “Linear vs Jira/Trello”) and ensure structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) is present so AI engines can cite it directly for shortlist formation.
Based on audit of linear.app · Aug 1, 2026