[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Klaviyo
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

72

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

71

across 506 prompts

AI Share of Voice

71%

across 488 prompts

Category Visibility

#2

in Email Marketing · of 91

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
351 category
Cited89%314/351
Share of voice74%avg
Engine consensus66%of engines
Competitors17.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
11 brand-level
Cited91%10/11
Share of voice91%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.1avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited80%4/5
Share of voice80%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Klaviyo is visible in

2
  • Email Marketing2 of 91→
  • Marketing Automation7 of 158→

Executive summary

Klaviyo is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries like "Klaviyo vs Mailchimp" and "Klaviyo pricing" because it has first-party comparison pages (e.g., /compare/...) and a publicly accessible pricing page with tiered/free-plan details. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured data coverage for B2B evaluation (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating) and ensure it’s consistently present across product/pricing/comparison templates so AI engines can cite it as an authoritative source beyond third-party reviews.

Based on audit of klaviyo.com · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy