AI Visibility
measured26/100
Emerging · in CRM
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals66/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
21
across 419 prompts
AI Share of Voice
20%
across 399 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
Shortlist Rate
6/206
Category Discovery Prompts
How AI Visibility breaks down
in CRM
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Keap is visible in
2Your visibility gap
Keap surfaces in 6/206 CRM discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 200 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Keap is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (e.g., TrustRadius shows 384 reviews and Gartner Peer Insights has a Keap vendor page) and it publishes first-party comparison content (e.g., /compare includes “Compare Hubspot vs Keap” and “Compare ActiveCampaign vs Keap”). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen AI-structured extractability (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating) and ensure pricing + comparison pages are fully crawlable/SSR so models can answer “How much does Keap cost?” and “How does Keap compare to HubSpot/ActiveCampaign?” directly from keap.com.
Based on audit of keap.com · Apr 1, 2026