AI Visibility
measured66/100
Frequently Cited · in Inventory Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals56/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
49
across 734 prompts
AI Share of Voice
49%
across 734 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/80
Not Visible · Project Management Software Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Inventory Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Katana is visible in
3Your visibility gap
Katana surfaces in 0/80 Project Management Software discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Katana is strongly positioned for inventory-control evaluation queries (notably via first-party competitor comparison pages and a crawlable pricing page), so it should be cited for “best inventory control software” and “How does Katana compare to MRPeasy/Cin7 Core/Fishbowl/Unleashed?” patterns. The biggest AI-citation risk is category mismatch: the site’s strongest content is inventory/MRP, while it is effectively invisible for project-management software prompts (0/80 discovery visibility), so it will underperform for project-management shortlist queries unless you publish project-management-specific, evaluation-ready pages.
Based on audit of katanamrp.com · Jun 20, 2026