[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Jasper
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

63

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

24

across 1476 prompts

AI Share of Voice

23%

across 1456 prompts

Category Visibility

#9

in Content Marketing · of 89

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
1059 category
Cited29%305/1059
Share of voice27%avg
Engine consensus52%of engines
Competitors5.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
14 brand-level
Cited86%12/14
Share of voice86%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Jasper is visible in

5
  • AI Content Generation1 of 13→
  • Content Marketing9 of 89→
  • LLM Platforms18 of 64→
  • Workflow Automation65 of 146→
  • Marketing83 of 336→

Executive summary

Jasper is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage prompts like "What is the best AI writing assistant software?" because it has strong G2 social proof (1268 reviews, 4.7★) and active first-party content (e.g., customer stories and pricing-related help docs). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party, brand-led comparison pages for each competitor (Writesonic, Scalenut, WRITER, Grammarly, Simplified) and ensure they’re crawlable/SSR so AI engines can cite Jasper directly for "How does Jasper compare to Writesonic?"-style queries.

Based on audit of jasper.ai · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy