AI Visibility
measured22/100
Emerging · in Collaboration
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals55/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 388 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 388 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Collaboration
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Ideanote is visible in
3Executive summary
Ideanote is already strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has substantial third-party review presence (286 G2 reviews) and a public pricing page with specific tiers (Free and Ultimate starting at $899/month). The biggest risk for AI engines is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “self-serve” citation: first-party comparison coverage exists (/compare) but may not be structured to reliably answer “[Ideanote] vs [competitor]” evaluation prompts, and there’s no clear evidence of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data on the site.
Based on audit of ideanote.io · Oct 7, 2026