AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Identity & Access Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals51/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
9
across 202 prompts
AI Share of Voice
6%
across 185 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Identity & Access Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories ID.me is visible in
2Executive summary
ID.me is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage identity-verification queries because it has an active G2 profile (56 reviews) and a TrustRadius review page, plus a substantial case-study library. The biggest citation risk is conversion-stage queries (pricing/get-started) and evaluation-stage “vs/alternatives” pages: the domain shows a competitive-comparison page, but there’s no clear evidence of crawlable, tiered pricing or SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data for AI evaluation prompts.
Based on audit of id.me · Aug 29, 2026