AI Visibility
measured45/100
Frequently Cited · in Identity & Access Management
measured from this brand's audit prompts
AEO Readiness
fundamentals54/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
7
across 202 prompts
AI Share of Voice
1%
across 185 prompts
Critical Issues
2
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Identity & Access Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured across this brand's own audit prompts (it isn't in a tracked category rollup yet). Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Huntress is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has a strong G2 presence (hundreds of reviews) and first-party comparison pages (e.g., Huntress vs SentinelOne / Sophos / Blackpoint). The single highest-ROI fix is to ensure full B2B structured data coverage (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage for evaluation/pricing/integrations) and verify it’s crawlable on the key product/pricing pages—this is what most often blocks rich AI citations even when reviews/comparisons exist.
Based on audit of huntress.com · Sep 1, 2026