[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Hotjar
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

66

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

35

across 971 prompts

AI Share of Voice

35%

across 952 prompts

Category Visibility

#4

in Product Analytics · of 54

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
649 category
Cited48%311/649
Share of voice41%avg
Engine consensus51%of engines
Competitors11.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
13 brand-level
Cited85%11/13
Share of voice85%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited83%5/6
Share of voice83%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Hotjar is visible in

4
  • Product Analytics4 of 54→
  • Product Experience5 of 73→
  • Feedback Management10 of 179→
  • Data & Analytics45 of 254→

Executive summary

Hotjar is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 presence (339–341 reviews, ~4.3★) and first-party comparison content for at least one key rival (Hotjar vs FullStory). The single highest-ROI fix is to expand first-party comparison coverage to match the exact competitor prompts (Hotjar vs Glassbox, plus alternatives pages that explicitly include Hotjar alongside FullStory/Glassbox/Mouseflow/Lucky Orange/LogRocket) so AI can cite Hotjar for the full set of comparison and alternatives query patterns.

Based on audit of hotjar.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy