AI Visibility
measured33/100
Emerging · in Vertical SaaS
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals61/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
10
across 433 prompts
AI Share of Voice
10%
across 433 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Vertical SaaS
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
GoHighLevel is a well-cited B2B SaaS brand for evaluation-stage queries (e.g., it has a G2 seller profile with ~640 reviews and a TrustRadius profile with 41 reviews), and it publishes first-party pricing ($97/$297/$497 tiers) plus first-party comparison content (e.g., HubSpot vs HighLevel). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen AI-evaluation citation surfaces by adding/ensuring SoftwareApplication + FAQPage structured data on key product/pricing/comparison pages and validating that review-related AggregateRating markup is valid (there’s a reported AggregateRating schema issue in HighLevel’s Reviews widget).
Based on audit of gohighlevel.com · Jun 11, 2026