AI Visibility
measured33/100
Emerging · in Vertical SaaS
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals56/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 558 prompts
AI Share of Voice
3%
across 542 prompts
Critical Issues
2
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Vertical SaaS
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories GymMaster is visible in
2Executive summary
GymMaster is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation and conversion queries because it has public, tiered pricing and appears on G2 with a strong rating (4.7/5) and 20 reviews. The biggest risk is evaluation-stage comparison citation: while GymMaster has first-party comparison-style content (e.g., “Mindbody alternative” and “GymMaster vs ABC Fitness”), there’s no clear evidence of a dedicated, crawlable “[GymMaster] vs [Competitor]” comparison page set that AI can reliably extract for shortlist formation.
Based on audit of gymmaster.com · Aug 30, 2026