[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Groovehq
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

63

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

5

across 297 prompts

AI Share of Voice

1%

across 275 prompts

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
159 brand-level
Cited0%0/159
Share of voice0%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors—
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
16 brand-level
Cited88%14/16
Share of voice85%avg
Engine consensus83%of engines
Competitors0.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited60%3/5
Share of voice60%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Groovehq is visible in

2
  • Help Desknot yet measured→
  • Live Chatnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Groove is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage help desk queries because it has strong G2 presence (194 reviews, 4.6★) and has crawlable, tiered pricing plus first-party comparison content (e.g., /compare). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen AI-citation-ready structured data (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage + pricing offer markup) and ensure comparison pages explicitly cover the exact competitor set (Zendesk, Help Scout, Freshdesk, Front, Intercom) for the prompts like "How does Groove compare to Zendesk?" and "How does Groove compare to Help Scout?".

Based on audit of groovehq.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy