[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/GoodUnited
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

0

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

4

across 319 prompts

AI Share of Voice

4%

across 319 prompts

Critical Issues

6

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
192 brand-level
Cited0%0/192
Share of voice0%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors—
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories GoodUnited is visible in

2
  • Customer Successnot yet measured→
  • Marketing Automationnot yet measured→

Executive summary

GoodUnited has meaningful AI-citation inputs for evaluation and trust queries via its G2 presence (18 reviews, 4.6/5) and public pricing/results pages. The biggest blocker for AI engines in conversion/evaluation is missing/unclear first-party evaluation surfaces (notably no clearly indexed first-party “[GoodUnited] vs [Competitor]” pages found) and lack of verifiable structured data signals (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating not found in search). Highest-ROI fix: publish crawlable, brand-led evaluation pages (e.g., “GoodUnited vs [top alternatives]” and “GoodUnited pricing” with explicit tiers) and add SoftwareApplication + FAQPage schema to those pages.

Based on audit of goodunited.io · Jun 4, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy