AI Visibility
measured53/100
Frequently Cited · in Applicant Tracking
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals15/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
23
across 359 prompts
AI Share of Voice
23%
across 359 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
Shortlist Position
22/80
Niche · Applicant Tracking Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Applicant Tracking
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories GoodTime is visible in
2Your visibility gap
GoodTime surfaces in 22/80 Applicant Tracking discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 58 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
GoodTime has strong B2B citation inputs from G2 (116 reviews, 4.4★) and a publicly accessible pricing page, but it is at high risk for evaluation-stage AI answers that require first-party comparison and structured product metadata. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish first-party, brand-led comparison pages for ModernLoop and Prelude (and add SoftwareApplication/FAQPage schema) so AI can cite GoodTime for the exact evaluation queries like "How does GoodTime compare to ModernLoop?" and "How does GoodTime compare to Prelude?".
Based on audit of goodtime.io · May 7, 2026