AI Visibility
measured21/100
Emerging · in Nonprofit Software
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals4/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
7
across 408 prompts
AI Share of Voice
7%
across 408 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Nonprofit Software
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Glue Up is visible in
3Executive summary
Glue Up is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has a strong G2 presence (139 reviews) and first-party comparison content like “Glue Up vs. Wild Apricot” with recent updates. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen crawlable structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and ensure AI-citable evaluation blocks exist across pricing and comparison pages (not just human-readable content), so queries like “How much does Glue Up cost?” and “What is the best association management software for membership management and event registration?” can be answered directly from glueup.com.
Based on audit of glueup.com · May 7, 2026