AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Audit & SOX
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals51/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
6
across 191 prompts
AI Share of Voice
6%
across 191 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Audit & SOX
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
flowdit.com is moderately likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has public, crawlable pricing ($0 / $12 / $22 per user-month) and multiple first-party comparison pages (e.g., “SafetyCulture alternative”, “Lumiform alternative”). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/strengthen B2B structured data for AI evaluation (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage + AggregateRating where applicable) and ensure those pages are fully crawlable/SSR so AI engines can cite them for “pricing” and “vs/alternatives” prompts.
Based on audit of flowdit.com · Sep 30, 2026