AI Visibility
measured71/100
Frequently Cited · in Resource Planning
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals33/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
65
across 618 prompts
AI Share of Voice
65%
across 618 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Resource Planning
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Floatapp.com is a B2B cash flow forecasting SaaS with strong third-party review presence (notably Capterra 4.8/5 from 67 reviews and TrustRadius 9/10 from 6 reviews) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit tiers and prices. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage “brand vs competitor” coverage: Float hosts comparison-style content (e.g., cash-flow tool comparisons), but there’s no clear evidence of first-party, indexable “[Float] vs [Competitor]” pages that AI engines can reliably cite for shortlist formation.
Based on audit of floatapp.com · Oct 4, 2026