AI Visibility
measured28/100
Emerging · in Finance
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals50/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
19
across 177 prompts
AI Share of Voice
19%
across 177 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Finance
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Finaloop is likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has a G2 profile with 24 reviews and a 4.7/5 rating, plus a publicly accessible pricing page with at least one explicit tier ($245/month Starter). The biggest AI-citation risk is conversion-stage “pricing plans / cost” and evaluation-stage “vs/alternatives” queries: the site’s first-party comparison coverage and crawlability signals (robots.txt/llms.txt/schema) could not be verified, so AI may rely on third parties instead of citing Finaloop directly.
Based on audit of finaloop.com · Oct 5, 2026