AI Visibility
measured46/100
Frequently Cited · in Meeting Tools
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals7/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
28
across 1456 prompts
AI Share of Voice
28%
across 1456 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
Shortlist Position
5/79
Not Visible · Collaboration Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Meeting Tools
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Your visibility gap
Fathom surfaces in 5/79 Collaboration discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 74 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Fathomhq.com is a B2B SaaS with meaningful AI citation signals (e.g., G2 reviews exist and pricing is publicly crawlable with explicit tiers). The biggest AI-visibility risk is category mismatch: your provided shortlist is “Collaboration,” but live signals show FathomHQ is primarily positioned as financial reporting/forecasting/consolidation software, so it will be hard to win citations for collaboration queries like “best collaboration tools for marketing teams” and “collaboration software for creative agencies.” Highest-ROI fix: create collaboration-category landing pages and evaluation content that match the buyer intent of those gap queries (and ensure the site’s primary product messaging aligns with “collaboration software” rather than financial reporting).
Based on audit of fathomhq.com · May 5, 2026