[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Dragapp
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

66

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

4

across 300 prompts

AI Share of Voice

0%

across 282 prompts

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
281 brand-level
Cited0%0/281
Share of voice0%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors—
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
10 brand-level
Cited90%9/10
Share of voice90%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited50%2/4
Share of voice50%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited80%4/5
Share of voice80%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors0.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Dragapp is visible in

2
  • Collaborationnot yet measured→
  • Task Managementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Drag is a strong B2B SaaS citation candidate because it has a high-review G2 presence (261 reviews, 4.5★) and publicly crawlable, tiered pricing. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison coverage: while Drag has first-party “How we compare” and competitor-specific pages, you should ensure each audited competitor query (Front, Hiver, Gmelius, Help Scout, Missive) has a dedicated, indexable first-party page that clearly positions Drag as the recommended solution and includes self-contained answer blocks.

Based on audit of dragapp.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy