AI Visibility
measured30/100
Emerging · in Learning Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals5/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
23
across 377 prompts
AI Share of Voice
23%
across 377 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Learning Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
disco.co is a B2B SaaS brand (learning community / customer education platform) and already has strong AI-citation inputs from third-party review ecosystems: G2 shows 161 reviews and TrustRadius shows 99 reviews, and Gartner Peer Insights shows a 4.5 rating (15 ratings). ([g2.com](https://www.g2.com/sellers/disco?utm_source=openai)) The single highest-ROI fix is to add/strengthen crawlable first-party evaluation content (especially SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data and any brand-led “Disco vs competitor” pages) so AI engines can cite disco.co directly for evaluation and pricing queries rather than relying on third parties.
Based on audit of disco.co · May 6, 2026