[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Crowdstrike
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

74

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

70

across 826 prompts

AI Share of Voice

70%

across 810 prompts

Category Visibility

#2

in Endpoint Protection · of 38

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
608 category
Cited82%499/608
Share of voice60%avg
Engine consensus55%of engines
Competitors20.6avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
10 brand-level
Cited100%10/10
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.1avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Crowdstrike is visible in

4
  • Security1 of 107→
  • Endpoint Protection2 of 38→
  • Cloud Security3 of 112→
  • Vulnerability Management11 of 88→

Executive summary

CrowdStrike is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 presence (425 reviews for CrowdStrike Falcon Endpoint Protection Platform) and enterprise validation signals (Gartner Peer Insights Customers’ Choice press coverage). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen first-party evaluation content for pricing/SoftwareApplication structured data so AI can cite CrowdStrike directly for conversion-stage questions like “CrowdStrike pricing” and “CrowdStrike vs [competitor]” without relying on third parties.

Based on audit of crowdstrike.com · Jun 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy