[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Crisp Chat
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

58

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

6

across 299 prompts

AI Share of Voice

2%

across 278 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
160 category
Cited1%1/160
Share of voice1%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
15 brand-level
Cited100%15/15
Share of voice98%avg
Engine consensus83%of engines
Competitors1.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
7 brand-level
Cited71%5/7
Share of voice67%avg
Engine consensus89%of engines
Competitors3.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Crisp Chat is visible in

2
  • Help Desknot yet measured→
  • Live Chatnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Crisp is a B2B customer service software brand with strong primary review authority on G2 (189 reviews, 4.5★) and publicly crawlable pricing tiers. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison coverage: while Crisp has first-party “alternatives” and “comparisons” pages, the site’s comparison pages appear to include competitor-vs-competitor framing (e.g., “Zendesk vs Tidio”, “Freshdesk vs Facebook Chat”) which can cause citation backfire for queries like “How does Crisp compare to Intercom/Zendesk/Freshdesk/Tidio/LiveChat?”. Highest-ROI fix: create/ensure dedicated first-party pages that are explicitly “Crisp vs Intercom”, “Crisp vs Zendesk”, “Crisp vs Freshdesk”, “Crisp vs Tidio”, and “Crisp vs LiveChat” with Crisp leading the recommendation and minimal rival-rival framing.

Based on audit of crisp.chat · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy