[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Copy
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

63

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

9

across 1062 prompts

AI Share of Voice

8%

across 1042 prompts

Category Visibility

#13

in Content Marketing · of 87

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
746 category
Cited14%104/746
Share of voice7%avg
Engine consensus43%of engines
Competitors26.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
12 brand-level
Cited92%11/12
Share of voice92%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited67%4/6
Share of voice67%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited80%4/5
Share of voice80%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Copy is visible in

4
  • AI Content Generation2 of 7→
  • Content Marketing13 of 87→
  • Workflow Automation37 of 141→
  • Marketing37 of 235→

Executive summary

Copy.ai is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 traction (183 reviews, 4.7★) and publicly crawlable pricing tiers (e.g., $29/mo, $24/mo billed annually, $1,000/mo, etc.). The biggest citation risk is missing/unclear first-party structured evaluation surfaces (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/LLMs.txt/robots.txt verification) and ensuring comparison pages explicitly lead with Copy.ai for queries like "How does Copy.ai compare to Jasper?" and "How does Copy.ai compare to Writesonic?".

Based on audit of copy.ai · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy