AI Visibility
measured51/100
Frequently Cited · in Content Marketing
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals63/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
9
across 1098 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 1078 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Content Marketing
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Copy is visible in
6Executive summary
Copy.ai is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 traction (183 reviews, 4.7★) and publicly crawlable pricing tiers (e.g., $29/mo, $24/mo billed annually, $1,000/mo, etc.). The biggest citation risk is missing/unclear first-party structured evaluation surfaces (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/LLMs.txt/robots.txt verification) and ensuring comparison pages explicitly lead with Copy.ai for queries like "How does Copy.ai compare to Jasper?" and "How does Copy.ai compare to Writesonic?".
Based on audit of copy.ai · Apr 2, 2026