AI Visibility
measured45/100
Frequently Cited · in Design
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
50
across 1111 prompts
AI Share of Voice
51%
across 1101 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
Shortlist Position
1/74
Not Visible · Marketing Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Design
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Contrast is visible in
2Your visibility gap
Contrast surfaces in 1/74 Marketing discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 73 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Contrast is already strongly positioned for evaluation-stage AI citations via G2 (175 reviews, 4.8★) and first-party pricing plus multiple competitor comparison pages (e.g., Contrast vs. Livestorm). The biggest remaining risk is conversion-stage structured citation: the site’s pricing is crawlable, but there’s no evidence (from live checks) of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/Organization schema that AI engines reliably use for rich evaluation answers.
Based on audit of getcontrast.io · Oct 9, 2026