[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Constantcontact
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

63

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

6

across 337 prompts

AI Share of Voice

7%

across 337 prompts

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
202 category
Cited5%10/202
Share of voice5%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentimentpositive4+ / 2~ / 0−
⚖️Evaluation
7 brand-level
Cited86%6/7
Share of voice86%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.3avg/cited
Sentimentpositive10+ / 8~ / 0−
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice87%avg
Engine consensus87%of engines
Competitors2.4avg/cited
Sentimentpositive4+ / 8~ / 0−
💰Conversion
7 brand-level
Cited71%5/7
Share of voice62%avg
Engine consensus87%of engines
Competitors1.0avg/cited
Sentimentpositive3+ / 9~ / 0−

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Constantcontact is visible in

2
  • Email Marketingnot yet measured→
  • Marketing Automationnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Constant Contact is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation and conversion queries because it has strong third-party review presence (e.g., G2 shows 7,397 reviews) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit tiers ($12/$35/$80). The biggest citation risk is Technical AEO/Structured Data: robots.txt blocks parts of /blog/ and there is no evidence (from search) of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating markup on key pages, which can reduce eligibility for Google AI Overviews and other rich-answer surfaces.

Based on audit of constantcontact.com · Jun 11, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy