[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Conga
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

58

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

69

across 507 prompts

AI Share of Voice

70%

across 483 prompts

Category Visibility

#4

in Contract Lifecycle Management · of 60

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
363 category
Cited72%262/363
Share of voice60%avg
Engine consensus57%of engines
Competitors9.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
13 brand-level
Cited85%11/13
Share of voice85%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.6avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
7 brand-level
Cited86%6/7
Share of voice86%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
8 brand-level
Cited38%3/8
Share of voice38%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors3.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Conga is visible in

4
  • Document Generation2 of 56→
  • Contract Lifecycle Management4 of 60→
  • Proposal & CPQ6 of 42→
  • Revenue Operationsnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Conga is strongly positioned for AI citation on CPQ evaluation queries because it has substantial G2 presence (2,083+ reviews on G2) and enterprise validation via Gartner Peer Insights Customers’ Choice (2024 and 2025 press signals). The highest-risk pattern is pricing and evaluation-stage comparison citation: the public pricing page is non-specific (“customized pricing” / “Get Conga pricing”) and first-party competitor comparison coverage appears to be blog/FAQ-style rather than dedicated, crawlable “[Conga] vs Salesforce CPQ / Oracle CPQ / SAP CPQ” pages.

Based on audit of conga.com · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy