AI Visibility
measured42/100
Frequently Cited · in Workflow Automation
measured from this brand's audit prompts
AEO Readiness
fundamentals5/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 326 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 326 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Workflow Automation
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured across this brand's own audit prompts (it isn't in a tracked category rollup yet). Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories CLM 365 is visible in
2Executive summary
apps365.com is a B2B Microsoft 365/SharePoint app suite vendor, but AI citation risk is highest for evaluation-stage queries like "apps365.com vs competitor" and "best [category] software" because first-party comparison coverage is unclear and structured evaluation signals (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) were not found via live checks. The single highest-ROI fix is to ensure crawlable, SSR-first product pages with SoftwareApplication + FAQPage schema and to publish brand-led "Apps365 [Product] vs [Competitor]" pages that AI can extract and cite.
Based on audit of apps365.com · May 6, 2026