AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Real Estate & Property Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals37/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 192 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 192 prompts
Critical Issues
7
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/80
Not Visible · Crm Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Real Estate & Property Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories ClientLook® is visible in
1Your visibility gap
ClientLook® surfaces in 0/80 Crm discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
ClientLook has a measurable baseline of AI citation via G2 (12 reviews, 3.6★), but it is likely under-cited for evaluation and conversion prompts because first-party comparison and pricing content appears missing/uncrawlable. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish crawlable, first-party pages that directly answer evaluation queries like "How does ClientLook compare to Apto?" and "How much does ClientLook cost?" with structured, self-contained blocks.
Based on audit of clientlook.com · Aug 30, 2026