AI Visibility
measured33/100
Emerging · in Identity & Access Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals4/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
24
across 485 prompts
AI Share of Voice
24%
across 485 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Identity & Access Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Clever is visible in
3Executive summary
Clever.com is a B2B edtech infrastructure platform (K-12 identity/rostering + partner integrations) and is already cited by AI engines via strong third-party review surfaces—e.g., G2 shows 42 reviews at 4.4/5 for “Clever (By Clever Portal)”. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage “Clever vs competitor” and “Clever pricing” queries where first-party comparison pages and crawlable structured pricing signals (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) are likely missing or not reliably extractable; the single highest-ROI fix is to publish/ensure indexable first-party evaluation pages (brand-led comparisons + schema) that AI can cite directly.
Based on audit of clever.com · Oct 7, 2026